shalako wrote:
You have to check back (or check raise oop) strong, medium and air/weak hands equally. If you check back the medium hands all the time (which tends to be the norm for pot control) a perceptive villain will pot the turn putting yourself in a difficult decision. Keeping the "calling range" polarized is key.
Have you seen my post? That's why I decided to put our best x hands in our calling range. We use our very best hands for this purpose because those hands are least likely to be outdrawn. And since we play NL (right?) we can get all our money in later anyways.
For more than one betsize, I'd expect a solution like this:
(Let's asume 2 different possible betsizes)
Slowplay-Call
Value-Raise Small (Pseudo Thin Value)
Value-Raise Big
Value-Raise Small
Call
Bluff-Raise Small
Bluff-Raise Big
Fold
Obv we could implement more betsizes the same way. I believe a pure-strategy-equilibrium would look like this. If I was true, we could solve games much faster, since we would only need to get the percentages right.
What do you guys think? Am I too optimistic?