Poker-AI.orgPoker AI and Botting Discussion Forum2014-07-10T08:26:06+00:00http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/feed.php?f=22&t=27522014-07-10T08:26:06+00:002014-07-10T08:26:06+00:00http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2752&p=6158#p6158nemesis17 wrote:
So it seems like sngegt is buggy. Is there any bug free version available?
sngegt is not supported for several years. I doubt you can find bug free version of it.
Statistics: Posted by AutomateIt — Thu Jul 10, 2014 8:26 am
]]>2014-06-16T19:49:04+00:002014-06-16T19:49:04+00:00http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2752&p=6096#p6096Statistics: Posted by nemesis17 — Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:49 pm
]]>2014-06-16T06:09:59+00:002014-06-16T06:09:59+00:00http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2752&p=6095#p6095Statistics: Posted by AutomateIt — Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:09 am
]]>2014-05-21T15:31:01+00:002014-05-21T15:31:01+00:00http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2752&p=6033#p6033http://i.imgur.com/cNU8SCI.png. However when I calculate the same situation with ICMIZER http://www.icmpoker.com/icmizer/#mzhW or holdem resources http://www.holdemresources.net/hr/sngs/ ... 45&s3=1005 I get a much tighter range (22% and 26.7% respectively). AFAIK the last two tools consider overcalls while SNGEGT does not. Could this be the cause of the discrepancy?
Thanks.
Statistics: Posted by nemesis17 — Wed May 21, 2014 3:31 pm