Nasher wrote:
...However, they don't perform well against human competition.
How were you able to conclude that? Is your sample number decent? Don't forget variance.
Also, CFRM provides a static defensive strategy. It isn't a best response strategy, so it is in no way the best strategy to use against humans that play an exploitable strategy, plus humans cannot be as consistent, increasing variance.
Nasher wrote:
If anybody is interested in improving these strategies, I can share them with you. Just PM me here.
I think I would be interested in that as I am trying to achieve the same thing for my thesis. It would be a great help if we could discuss this.Statistics: Posted by npolychr — Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:25 pm
]]>