Wuld wrote:
I want to train my neural networks to predict the opponents move for a given situation. One vital information of course are the pocket cards the opponent holds.
I have a database of hand histories an it's easy to assign the cards when a specific hand history reveals the opponents pocket cards (showdown or just because the opp shows his cards).
But this of course is the minority of the histories.
How can I predict the hole cards when there are no informations about it?
...
I fight with similar problems.
Atm I do not predict cards, but Hand Strength and Hand Potential. That seems much easier than predicting the exact hand. From the knowledge you gain from showdown hands you can try to learn something about the hands without known cards since you have some info about that distribution. It is some kind of voodoo, I did not get very far with it. The literature about it is not very precise about the results they get. And some papers do not explain very well how they do what they do (e.g. exact input into the NN).
Atm I'm thinking about first filtering the hands that are a clear bluff, to have a more exact prediction of the non-bluff strength...
Edit: not to steal the thread, but a paper with too few detail for a noob like me is the following. I get the basic idea, but I'm too dumb to apply it from the details they give: Using Kullback-Leibler Divergence to Model Opponents in PokerStatistics: Posted by SkyBot — Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:35 pm
]]>