Poker-AI.org Poker AI and Botting Discussion Forum 2013-09-04T16:09:21+00:00 http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/feed.php?f=24&t=2572 2013-09-04T16:09:21+00:00 2013-09-04T16:09:21+00:00 http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2572&p=4808#p4808 <![CDATA[Re: Calculating E[HS2] ?]]> Statistics: Posted by vlad2048 — Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:09 pm


]]>
2013-09-04T13:15:27+00:00 2013-09-04T13:15:27+00:00 http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2572&p=4807#p4807 <![CDATA[Re: Calculating E[HS2] ?]]>
a = (0.4,0.6)
b = (0.2,0.8)

ehs(a) = 0.5
ehs(b) = 0.5

ehs2(a) = 0.26
ehs2(b) = 0.34

ehs2 ranks high potential hands higher than low potential hands even when average strength (ehs) is the same.

Statistics: Posted by spears — Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:15 pm


]]>
2013-09-04T11:58:24+00:00 2013-09-04T11:58:24+00:00 http://poker-ai.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2572&p=4806#p4806 <![CDATA[Calculating E[HS2] ?]]> poker.cs.ualberta.ca/publications/johanson.msc.pdf
Specifically on page 25 he writes:
E[HS2](b)=(0.2^2+0.8^2)/2=0.68 but that's wrong !
It's =0.34
So what's the correct formula ?
If the result is not bigger than 0.5 then it doesn't prove his point:
E[HS2] considers the hand with higher potential to be more similar to hands with high hand strength.

Statistics: Posted by vlad2048 — Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:58 am


]]>